While an essential goal of the Endangered Species Act is to increase attention to the endangered and threatened species, compliance with the law also leads to unintended consequences. The problem stems from a simple fact: increased ESA demands do not equate with increased government agency resources. Three news stories this week highlighted the tensions between the ESA demands, and the other competing needs, priorities and duties of state agencies.
.....
With number of ESA-listed species ever growing, and indeed, with global climate change threatening an explosion in threats to species, the absolute demands of the ESA could become increasingly difficult, or even impossible, to bear. When that day comes (assuming it hasn't already), and in the absence of increased funding, a triage system becomes inevitable.
Other recent posts you may find interesting - mainly because they are Californian stories:
No comments:
Post a Comment